Lincoln or Gleichschaltung?

Plaudits and admirations gush upon leaders whose manner is tolerant and considerate of opposing viewpoints.  History nonetheless allows that some who rule by treachery rise to ferocious power, too. 
 
In the first instance, Doris Kearns Goodwin's book Team of Rivals acclaims Abraham Lincoln's phenomenal appointments of political rivals to his own cabinet. His picks were prompted by the urgency of slave states seceding to form the Confederacy.
 
Though a capricious gambit, Lincoln's adroit management of a rancorous cabinet afforded him the counsel of "the very strongest men."  He (they) successfully concluded the Civil War and maintained the Republic.
 
In suitable contrast stands the example of Gleichschaltung Laws imposed by Adolph Hitler's Nazi regime.  The term gleichschaltung, meaning "synchronization," came to define the successive process by which the leftist Nazi party accomplished rapid authoritarian control over key aspects of German society - the elimination of unsupportive influential organizations such as trade unions, opposition parties and independent churches.
 
In the name of democracy, the Nazis took direct control of organizations the new government could not eliminate such as schools, the media, regional and local jurisdictions.  The government even assumed ownership interests in principle businesses and industries including automobile manufacturing, banking and healthcare.
 
Gleichschaltung became a convenient term to justify radical liberal policies as necessary and patriotic responses to an extraordinary economic crisis.  Many German citizens embraced the term as intellectual anesthesia to rationalize languid acceptance of the new powers, violence and force used to compel their compliance.
 
As their businesses and institutions became tools of the Third Reich, legions of German citizens explained their torpor as essential, even righteous, under the new democratic order of Gleichshaltung
 
Prudent Americans must fully understand the times we are now in and alertly discern the quickening steps of the country's leaders - whether they soberly respond to extraordinary economic crisis in the candid transparent style of Lincoln or by the disorienting treachery of tyrants. 
 
Among LPR's goals is to train citizen leaders to recognize the differences and thereby grow the capacity to defend liberty - to maintain the Republic.

 

4 comments (Add your own)

1. LPR fan wrote:
Makes it pretty clear which direction our country is currently headed. Good historical reference -- unfortunately. Seems America remembers the past and is still doomed to repeat it.

July 31, 2009 @ 1:08 PM

2. Kelly wrote:
Enlightening & thought provoking piece.

July 31, 2009 @ 1:20 PM

3. JantiqueB on Twitter wrote:
Obama loaded his cabinet with people of diverse points of view, and diverse political affiliations. It is far too early in his tenure to know whether he will use them effectively and by effectively I mean to allow the expression of disparate points of view with a goal to form the best solution after considering all the angles. As a new incumbent, he seems to feel the need to control everything and needs to step back to let his cabinet do their jobs. Hopefully he will gain confidence in his staff over time. But in the meantime, I don't think Congress will blindly follow him. Hopefully healthcare reform will be thoroughly explored before decisions are made.

July 31, 2009 @ 1:25 PM

4. LPR fan wrote:
Diverse points of view and political affiliations? Like who? Who's the pro-capitalist in the Obama administration? Who's the pro-Israel person? Who's not in favor of socialized health care? Who's opposing debt spending? The only "Rs" he appointed were well established big spenders and not at all conservatives (i.e. Ray LaHood). Who's the pro-drilling person in the Energy Dept., or at Interior? Who's opposed to the new tax-subsidized abortions? Who's for non-human-sacrifice stem-cell research? Who's for DC school vouchers? Who's the pro-Second Amendment champion? Who's advocating detaining terrorist prisoners at Gitmo (or anywhere else)? Who's the pro-capital-gains tax cut guy? Who's pushing abolishing the Death Tax? Who's advocating a robust national missile defense? Who's advocating victory in Iraq? Answer: These people simply weren't invited to the Cabinet. It's a very homogeneous club, despite the media's portrayal to the contrary.

Obama has surrounded himself with like-minded liberal thinkers only. Some may present opposing views and alternatives from time to time for the sake of consideration, but if there were real capitalists and freedom seekers on his team, they would have not tolerated government bailouts, bank ownership, auto-dealer ownership, Obamacare medicine, abortion subsidies, defunding missile defense, releasing terrorists, termination of DC scholarships, job-killing tax increases, enormous debt, bank bailouts, car-maker ownership, etc. No, on their honor, these people would quit. It's obvious they either drink the CoolAid or their government posts matter more than principle. Either way, the Obama Cabinet is clearly no "team of rivals." It's a cabal of socialists and nothing more.

July 31, 2009 @ 1:59 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.